Archive for the ‘Message Boards’ Category

CSS: Gratuitous Hooker Corpse Unit

Friday, August 31st, 2007

I’m finally getting around to learning CSS. I’d put it off before because I kept reading that some browsers don’t use it. Unfortunately, I didn’t notice that all of those articles were old and that just about every browser worth a damn works with CSS. I’m experimenting with it on ScrollBoss first since it only has one main style then I’ll try it out on Illmosis. I’ll try it out here last since this isn’t something that I’ve built from scratch. Keep your fingers crossed since that’ll mean this joint will be a lot less ugly. And in case you were wondering, yes, I only mentioned all that just so I could use that post title.


Comic writer Joe Casey turned in a great post about team-based comic books on the Newsarama Blog. If you’ve read the man’s work, you know that he knows how to write a good team. Here’s his list of favorites:AVENGERS #36-#202, DEFENDERS #1-124, NEW TEEN TITANS #1-44 + ANNUALS 1-3, JUSTICE LEAGUE #1-46, JLA #1-41 and SEVEN SOLDIERS #0. Then he throws in a few more: ALL-STAR COMICS #58-74, SECRET SOCIETY OF SUPER-VILLAINS #1-15, INVADERS #1-28 & THRILLER #1-7.

Notice how the letter X doesn’t appear anywhere in that list? A few people in the replies section did, though it was all in a more laid-back way than I’ve seen in other places. But this brings up one of the things I’ve never been able to understand about message boards. Nearly every time someone posts a favorites list, somebody comes in and bellows, “I can’t believe that you didn’t mention ‘Such & Such Incorporated’, you horse’s crusty ass!!!” or “Hey, you forgot ‘Ms. Whats-her-neck’, ‘the Thingamabob Bros.’ and ‘the Son of Whodat’, all classics to their very staples!” Really? Did they forget? Maybe the person who wrote the list has their own opinions of what they enjoy that doesn’t match up 100% to what you enjoy or even what the average person enjoys. Yes, it happens! There’s no need to get all huffy puffy ami yumi every damn time someone doesn’t agree with you. No one is challenging your claim as part of the Hive Mind of Normalcy. It’s just, you know, some people have spines. Again, it happens.


Another thing that’s probably going to keep me from fully getting into Justice League Unlimited figures: Solomon Grundy. Why? Low production run of 5000 plus eBay
= screw that. Nice figure, but I’d rather carve one out of wood than pay that much.

Why I don’t go to comic book message boards much: part 1

Friday, January 19th, 2007

Repulsor Ray Bill

Posts: 114
User-Level: Enforcer

PM
E-Mail

RE: New controversial comic book

Posted: January 18, 2007 7:39 PM
I really tried to like this book because it’s one of the main books that got me into reading comics. I mean, I like the talent they have on the book and the roster is okay… kinda sorta… but the stories just don’t give me the fix that they used to before all this. I gave it a chance for 3 months and $3, but it feels like I’ve been backing the wrong horse here. I just don’t like where this book is headed now, so I’m going to check out other books. Other people seem to be lovin’ it, so continue to enjoy. I’m out.

We’ll teach you the meaning of justice!

Murdurbloodkillrazor666-54

Posts: 38
User-Level: Trollkin

PM
E-Mail

RE: New controversial comic book

Posted: January 18, 2007 7:52 PM
DUDE YOU ARE MISSING OUT.

Repulsor Ray Bill

Posts: 114
User-Level: Enforcer

PM
E-Mail

RE: New controversial comic book

Posted: January 18, 2007 8:04 PM
Actually, I’ve missed nothing since there are only three issues in this new creative team’s run and those are the three issues that I mentioned in my previous post. There’s no indication that the direction will change so there is no need for me to continue purchasing a book that I no longer like. I wish the team continued success with the book, but I’m moving on to other books.

We’ll teach you the meaning of justice!

Murdurbloodkillrazor666-54

Posts: 38

User-Level: Trollkin

PM
E-Mail

RE: New controversial comic book

Posted: January 18, 2007 8:05 PM
DUDE YOU SO ARE MISSING OUT.

Negative Ion

Posts: 3157

User-Level: Celestial

PM
E-Mail

RE: New controversial comic book

Posted: January 18, 2007 8:19 PM
Face it, you just don’t like change. If you don’t like change, then you don’t like the future. If you don’t like the future then you need to stop reading comic books. Times change and books need to change or else they’ll stay the same and never grow by changing what they are. Stop trying to force everything to stay the same just for the sake of things not changing.

Change is good.

Repulsor Ray Bill

Posts: 114

User-Level: Enforcer

PM
E-Mail

RE: New controversial comic book

Posted: January 18, 2007 9:30 PM
Murdur: … the hell? Are you even reading my posts? How can you even follow this convoluted storyline (um, no offense) and not understand simple message board posts? How can I be missing out on something that I’m going to dislike? If your friend’s allergic to fish and he decides to not head with the rest of the crew to Long John Silver’s, is he missing out?

N.I.: You? You’re an ass. I’m not begging for the old characters to come back or for any change in the book. I’m just going to stop reading it. And that future crap? The books that I’m going to read instead of this one will be written, drawn and printed in the future and I will buy them in a slightly more distant future than that. I don’t hate change, I just don’t like what I don’t like. I know it sounds crazy, but it happens. If I hated change, I wouldn’t be reading the Atom, Manhunter (sigh) or Heroes for Hire. Just because something is changed doesn’t mean it’s been evolved or even improved. If you need proof, try cutting off one of your fingers. There. Did that improve your hand? If you think so, then you’re just as much of a trend-riding moron as your signature makes you out to be.

Enough of this. I’m not going to waste my time or derail this thread any further. I’m off to the Spidey 3 spoilers.

We’ll teach you the meaning of justice!

Negative Ion

Posts: 3157

User-Level: Celestial

PM
E-Mail

RE: New controversial comic book

Posted: January 18, 2007 9:31 PM
Shut up. We are the future.

Change is good.

Murdurbloodkillrazor666-54

Posts: 38

User-Level: Trollkin

PM
E-Mail

RE: New controversial comic book

Posted: January 18, 2007 9:32 PM
A FUTURE THAT DUDE WILL BE MISSING OUT ON

Disclaimer: this was a dramatization and not an actual message board topic. These are fictional people and the names were made up on the spot. They are not based on any actual people. No message boards were harmed during the making of this. Guests of tonight’s performance stayed at the Holiday Inn in beautiful downtown Burbank. But to tell the truth, I want to draw a picture of Repulsor Ray Bill now. Is that wrong?